14

You advised the Governor that the solar farm and smaller water diversion dam is the preferred option. The benefit of this option is that there are less environmental and social impacts, but the cost of the project and the electricity has notably increased.

Given that the reception to a somewhat more socially and environmentally sustainable project has been generally welcomed at greater cost, there is the opportunity to consider whether to move still further in this direction. The current project proposal still primarily benefits the large-scale actors (rice millers and rice farmers), and questions have been raised by others in Riverbank City who small-scale fishers are, farmers and those involved in tourism as to why the additional cost should be covered by the city as a whole. 

Would you like to recommend to the Governor to conduct a broader study gathering a wide range of viewpoints or proceed with funding the solar farm and water diversion dam?